Two Committees of the Louisiana House of Representatives next week will go back to work attempting to further dismantle public education and do more damage to the teaching profession.
House Education Committee: 9:00 AM, Wednesday, April 29So after all the dismal academic results of most of the voucher schools and the audits showing misuse of our tax dollars by greedy voucher school directors, and the terrible academic track record of vouchers nationwide, you may have thought that voucher fever in Louisiana had died down. . . Wrong! Voucher proponents have a bill to be heard the House Education Committee, Wednesday, April 29 that would allow new voucher schools to enroll more than the present statutory limit of 20% voucher students.
HB 330 by Badon would allow the LDOE to waive the 20% limit of voucher students in some of the voucher schools that have been in operation for less than two years. You see, the problem is that some new private schools have trouble getting off the ground with mostly private paying students, so this would let entrepreneurs start their schools with more publicly funded voucher students if they can convince the LDOE that they have a viable school even before they start! That has not been hard to do with John White's voucher loving LDOE. This is just another scheme to let the privatieers profit using our public school students and our tax money.
Many of these new voucher schools fit my definition of Predatory Schools. That is, private schools and charter schools that get public school funding and attempt to attract only the higher performing students so that their performance will look better than the real public schools. Even though these predatory schools are supposed to be non-discriminatory (The Brumfield Dodd requirement), no one really checks to see that they attract a fair ratio of black or at-risk students. In addition, they have the freedom to reject students with disabilities if they say that they are not equipped to instruct such students, (This exemption greatly boosts their scores on state tests), and they can easily use their discipline policies to remove disruptive and low performing students (further boosting their scores).
So next time you hear the proponents of privatization reciting their slogans and talking points like: "Its time to break up the public school monopoly", or "competition will force all schools to perform better for our students" be aware that these are false claims just to help justify ways of diverting our tax dollars to non-accountable predatory schools. They do not play by the same rules. If this process is allowed to continue, public schools will become the dumping grounds for underprivileged and low performing at-risk students while the managers who run these privatized schools get rich on our tax dollars. As my friend, former School Board Association President, Noel Hammatt often says: "Follow the money."
Note: In addition to the voucher schools, the BASIS Charter schools from Arizona wants to add 5 schools in Louisiana. It is the perfect example of a Pradatory Charter School. We already have magnet schools that perform this function and do not raid our tax dollars for the benefit of millionaires!
Please contact your State Representative and ask him/her to vote against HB 330!
Representative Ivey wants to remove all job security for teachers
HB 505 would not only eliminate the possibility of a new teacher ever gaining tenure, it would allow all such teachers to be terminated at the end of each school year without the need to provide a valid reason because this new law would give teachers only one year contracts! We need to keep the present law because LAE won several lawsuits last year in cases where teachers were being denied due process.
Governor Jindal and big business groups like LABI like this legislation because their goal is to make every teacher subject to dismissal at any time, for any reason. Right now it would not apply to experienced teachers, but I predict that if this is successful, they will go after experienced teachers next. Part of their rationale is that if teachers have no job protection, they can be told to work extra hours each day attending meetings to plan test prep or to provide extra tutoring sessions without pay after school or on Saturdays etc. You see, LABI does not want to pay for those extra services with their taxes. They obviously think that teachers don't have families and that their only goal in life should be to raise the almighty student test scores. You see, big business cannot force their employees to work extra hours without pay because there are federal laws that protect private employees from abuse. LABI companies have to pay their employees overtime when they work overtime but public school employees have no such protection under law. That's why they need this minimal protection under state law which this bill would take away.
Here is a typical scenario, although I am sure good principals would not do this:
A principal of a public school next school year will be under tremendous pressure from John White to raise the school performance score each year (even if the school already has a high score). The new evaluation system for principals for 2015-16 says that they have to raise their school performance score every year!
This particular principal decides that the only way to improve the student scores on the ever more difficult Common Core tests is for teachers to provide extra tutoring after school and on Saturdays. No matter that most students who are performing poorly will probably not even come to a tutoring session, the teacher will still be responsible for being there in case any kid shows up. On top of that, the principal could require teachers to make phone calls on their own time to parents to recruit kids to the tutoring sessions, or maybe even go to their homes and pick them up and give them a ride to the session. There is no limit to what big business and John White thinks teachers should have to do to raise test scores. These teachers have no protection under federal law about overtime work. . . they are "professional" public employees.
So if this new law passes, a principal may want teachers to work extra to save the principal from repercussions from John White's punitive new evaluation system. Do teachers who object to this extra work have any recourse? Yes, probably no court would allow them to be fired for refusing to do a bunch of useless overtime. So they could not be fired during the school year, but the principal would let it be known that any teacher who does not donate extra time to the tutoring program or who does not make phone calls to parents would not have their contract renewed for next year, and the teacher would have absolutely no recourse. This is like slave labor! There would no longer be a real teaching profession under these new rules! And you know what's really sad? These extra efforts don't really work for the students that are not motivated. The charter schools that tried these extra work programs have mostly abandoned them because they do not raise scores. Charter schools have found that there is a much more effective way of raising their test scores. Simply dump the low performing students back to the real public schools using strict discipline policies. The real public schools can't refuse them according to law!
Teachers Fight Back to Defend Payroll Deduction Rights; Tuesday, Town Hall telephone meeting and connections to legislators; 11 AM, Thursday April 30 visit to capitolOn Tuesday, April 28, at 6:00 PM LAE and LFT will host a joint town hall meeting by telephone conference call with their members to organize them to oppose efforts by LABI to deny teachers payroll deduction for Union or Association dues.
On Thursday, 11 AM, April 30 the LAE and LFT will sponsor a joint lobby day at the capitol to defend the right of teachers and other public employees to use payroll deduction for Union or Association dues. (This is open to both members and non-members)
HB 418 by Bishop of Lafayette is a blatant attack on teacher organizations. It will be heard in the House Labor and Industrial Relations Committee on Thursday. It's purpose is to weaken as much as possible the organizations that fight for teacher rights and that oppose the privatization of schools and the implementation of reckless and punitive reforms of our public schools.
This is a very critical fight, because I believe these teacher organizations are the last real hope for public schools and professional benefits and rights for teachers.
I urge teachers to join in this effort.