This blog has posted three different reports in the last 10
months exposing the following: (1) The dismal results on ACT scores by the RSD
even though the publicized goal of most RSD schools is college prep. (2) The fraudulent misreporting of dropouts as transfers for years by the RSD, resulting in a
highly inflated graduation rate. (3) The accurate comparison of RSD charters
with other public schools in Louisiana showing that RSD charters consistently
perform in the bottom third of all schools.
So why has the Louisiana Recovery District been touted across the nation
as the
miracle model for school reform and for the turnaround of low performing
schools? That has happened because supposedly prestigious groups like
the Cowen Institute in the past had issued glowing reports of progress by the
RSD using carefully selected data, much of which was bogus and covered up the
truly poor performance of the RSD.
The sad part of this education reform hoax, is that
thousands of students and teachers have been harmed in the process. Dedicated
teachers were unfairly fired; thousands of students have been pushed out into
the streets while the new charter managers cooked the books, and the charter operators
made off with huge profits from our tax dollars. This is what the Cowen
Institute and charter advocacy groups like Educate Now have promoted to the
public, our state legislature, and even to the "do gooder" national news
shows like Morning Joe, where both conservative and liberal opinion makers
touted the New Orleans RSD school “miracle”.
So several other states have created their own Recovery
Districts and Achievement Zones patterned after the New Orleans model, only to produce
disastrous results, because they were fooled by the corporate reformers and
privatizers of public education. Politicians in some states are including in their platforms privatization plans based on the New Orleans Recovery District model. Never before have I seen both a local and
national news media more complicit in the proliferation of false propaganda
that benefits con-artists like the privatizers and charter promoters portrayed in the RSD model. Yet the retractions of these bogus
reports are rare and the hoax goes on.
The most recent Cowen report has been totally removed from
the web site so it is impossible to fully analyze it in detail for its methodology, and the Cowen Institute is not eager to discuss the reasons for their retraction.
But here are a few key flaws in the report: (1) The report continued to use
inaccurate and inflated graduation rates for RSD schools and concluded that
many of the schools had “Beat the Odds” in graduating a higher than expected
percentage of at-risk students. The truth is that these schools had pushed out
the lowest performing students and called many of them transfers so they would
not be counted in the calculation of the graduation rate. The LDOE recently
reported that the overall graduation rate for the RSD in New Orleans was now a
dismal 59.5%. And this does not even count the students forced out before they
get to 9th grade. (2) The Cowen study used an inaccurate value added
calculation for students which produced the conclusion that even though the
at-risk students in the RSD were performing poorly on state tests, they were
still doing better than their socioeconomic status would predict. This
conclusion is easily discredited when one observes that the report admits that
RSD at-risk students on the whole still perform below similar students in our
regular public schools across the state. (3) The inclusion of more advanced
placement courses in the RSD has demonstrated the utter failure of the charter
schools in preparing students for college. The pass rate of only 5% on the AP
tests is the lowest in the state. An appallingly low percentage of these
students are being adequately prepared for college even though college prep has
been the primary stated goal of the RSD charters.
The entire structure of the RSD and its charter schools is a
house of cards built upon an obsessive drive to privatize schools and enrich
the operators at the expense of the students and the taxpayers. But now there
are so many legislators "on the take" from charter operators, who are still protected
by the compliant news media, that it will take some time to clean up the mess
and get back to solid basic education practices that really focus on the
students and take into account the real issues in dealing with high poverty
communities.